Adapters Request Portal

Cobas Pro retrieve automatically technical limit

When we have result outside of the technical limit, it specialist has to configure range mode res in the connexion.


Hopefully cobas pro is sending this information but not use by the driver:


MSH|^~\&|cobas pro||Host||20230302162136+0900||OUL^R22^OUL_R22|91|P|2.5.1|||NE|AL||UNICODE UTF-8|||LAB-29^IHE

PID|||19330||^^^^^^U||19700101|F

SPM|1|230012373401&BARCODE||SERPLAS^^99ROC|||||||P^^HL70369|||TEST MARITAL TEST DOSSIER LS, ~~~~|||20230302000000|||||||PSCO^^99ROC|||SC^^99ROC

SAC|||230012373401^BARCODE|||||||50062|1||||||||||||||||||^1^:^1

OBR|1|230012373401||20700^^99ROC|||||||G

ORC|SC||||CM

TQ1|||||||||R^^HL70485

OBX|1|NM|20700^20700^99ROC^^^IHELAW|1|33.0|μmol/L^^99ROC||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|2|CE|20700^20700^99ROC^^^IHELAW|1|^^99ROC|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

TCD|20700^^99ROC|^1^:^1

INV|2070011|OK^^HL70383~CURRENT^^99ROC|R1|2783|1|55||||||20230930||||661439

INV|2070011|OK^^HL70383~CURRENT^^99ROC|R2|2783|1|55||||||20230930||||661439

INV|2070012|OK^^HL70383~CURRENT^^99ROC|R3|2821|1|56||||||20230930||||661440

OBX|3|DTM|PT^Pipetting_Time^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|20230302161123|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|4|EI|CalibrationID^CalibrationID^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|657|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|5|EI|QCTID^QC Test ID^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|16848~16847|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|6|CE|QCSTATE^QC Status^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|2^^99ROC|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|7|ST|TR_TECHNICALLIMIT^TR_TECHNICALLIMIT^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|3.00 - 50.0|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|8|ST|TR_REPEATLIMIT^TR_REPEATLIMIT^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1| - |||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

OBX|9|ST|TR_EXPECTEDVALUES^TR_EXPECTEDVALUES^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|-99999 - 999999|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT

MSH|^~\&|cobas pro||Host||20230302162136+0900||ACK^R22^ACK|666b0045-6899-422c-9|P|2.5.1||||||UNICODE UTF-8|||LAB-29^IHE

MSA|AA|91



The goal is to :


  • automatically retrieve the lowest technical value when we have an alarme 27 and put <

  • automatically retrieve the highest technical value when we have an alarm 26 and no dilution put >

  • automatically retrieve the highest technical value and multiple by the dilution when we have an alarm 26 and a dilution put >


  • Guest
  • Mar 2 2023
  • Will not implement
  • Attach files
  • Paola Maita Gonzalez commented
    August 31, 2023 10:45

    Hello Marius,

    Thanks for the suggestion. I discussed this proposal with Raphael Bratfisch and we believe that for cobaspro the right implementation shall be made in infinity, not in the driver. If you need further information about this, he is the right person to approach to.

    Thanks,

    Paola

  • Marius Kibilda commented
    August 29, 2023 07:53

    Hello Paola,


    Infinity changes takes very long time, maybe we could evaluate if this workaround is possible?


    We have a workaround for similar challenge in integra driver/Infinity.

    We have a tick box in the CS settings "use range value as a result"

    *If we tick that box then integra sends result -99.9999 or +99.9999 we read result from other message field (technical limit).


    So maybe we could have same workaround while we wait for Infinity changes?


    Two tick boxes would do the trick:


    CS tick box name 1 "If alarm 27 use lower technical range result"

    *IF result contains flag 27 then add to result "lower technical limit"


    CS tick box name 2 "If alarm 26 use upper technical range result"

    *IF result contains flag 26 then add to result "upper technical limit"


    CS Two field to add a custom symbol to work in conjunction with tick boxes.

    *For lower limit If we put symbol < then < will be added to a result, but if leave it empty then only technical limit will be added to a result.

    *For upper limit If we put symbol > then > will be added to a result, but if leave it empty then only technical limit will be added to a result.


    OBX|7|ST|TR_TECHNICALLIMIT^TR_TECHNICALLIMIT^99ROC^S_OTHER^Other Supplemental^IHELAW|1|3.00 - 50.0|||112^^99ROC|||F|||||ALEROY~REALTIME||c503^ROCHE~22G4-01^ROCHE~1^ROCHE|20230302162136||||||||||RSLT



  • Guest commented
    May 15, 2023 07:07

    agreed

  • Guest commented
    March 29, 2023 10:08

    This would be great if we could use the information from the instrument. I agree that there should also be a change in Infinity first so we can use the values comingfrom the instrument.

  • Guest commented
    March 28, 2023 11:51

    I agree

  • Patrice Fayolle commented
    March 15, 2023 07:46

    I have created the Aha in infinity https://cil.ideas.aha.io/ideas/CIL-I-173

  • Paola Maita Gonzalez commented
    March 13, 2023 16:14

    Hello all,

    Thanks for all your feedback. It's clear to me that this feature would mean a major improvement in the field.

    After evaluating what we need to implement this, we have come to the conclusion that this implementation needs a change in cobas infinity first.

    Patrice, can you please create a request for infinity here? That's the portal for requesting changes in cobas infinity, which is not the same as this one.

    Please, reach out if you need further information.

    Regards,

    Paola

  • Guest commented
    March 09, 2023 10:54

    I agree too

  • Guest commented
    March 06, 2023 13:37

    i agree too

  • Guest commented
    March 06, 2023 13:37

    I agree

  • Guest commented
    March 06, 2023 09:16

    this fracture would save a lot of time to IT Specialists.
    It would be great to make profit from valuable informations sent by the instrument.

  • Guest commented
    March 06, 2023 06:50

    I agree too

  • Guest commented
    March 05, 2023 22:14

    I agree

  • Guest commented
    March 04, 2023 09:36

    I agree