Confirmed by Juan Tapia and Andres Garzon: Validation can't be performed (instrument not available in the customer lab) Status remains 'Sent for Field validation'
This driver is added in the backlog of the next planning (from February 1st to April 10th). You may follow the progress of our planning after January 31st here.
I am Núria Pena, currently covering Paola while she is her EDO in UX. After reviewing the request, we have seen it also supports batch mode and QC results. Would these workflows be required? Or only patient results as entered in the idea request.
Moreover, could you provide us with real traces from the 3 different type of instruments?
Guest
Confirmed by Juan Tapia and Andres Garzon: Validation can't be performed (instrument not available in the customer lab)
Status remains 'Sent for Field validation'
27/Oct/2025 - Message from Andres Garzon
------
Hello everyone,
This update is to inform you that the client is no longer using the analyzer. Therefore, it is no longer necessary to continue developing the driver.
I sincerely appreciate your kind cooperation.
Best regards,
Andrés Garzón J.
------
Hello Andres,
This driver is added in the backlog of the next planning (from February 1st to April 10th). You may follow the progress of our planning after January 31st here.
Thanks,
Paola
Hi Nuria
I would like to know the status of this driver?
Best,
Andrés Garzón :
Hi Nuria
I attach the real traces.
Bests,
Andrés.
Hi Núria,
We don´t need the batch mode and QC results, we only need patient results.
The driver would work for all three instruments.
I attach the reak traces.
Bests regards,
Andrés
Hi Andrés,
I am Núria Pena, currently covering Paola while she is her EDO in UX. After reviewing the request, we have seen it also supports batch mode and QC results. Would these workflows be required? Or only patient results as entered in the idea request.
Moreover, could you provide us with real traces from the 3 different type of instruments?
Best,
Núria